After Russian Cyberattack, Looking for Answers and Debating Retaliation

Those options, according to officials familiar with the discussions, include variants of President Barack Obama’s moves that were rejected after the hacking of the 2016 election system. He called Vladimir V., President of Russia. This involved using a cyber attack to reveal or freeze assets secretly held by Putin, oligarchs to break through Russian censorship to help communicate with the Russian people at a moment of political protest or Contact their link for technical tricks.

In a news briefing at the White House on Tuesday, the press secretary, Jane Saki, said an American response would come “in weeks, not months”. But first the United States would have to make a definite declaration that one of Russia’s intelligence agencies was responsible.

Mr. Smith said, “There is not much mystery about what we are talking about at the moment. He said that while Microsoft did not identify the intruders, it was anything contrary to the temporary discovery of American intelligence Did not see that Russia was “likely” to be the culprit.

Mr. Biden would then have to face another problem: to isolate what Russia did against its allies from the kind of espionage that the United States did. Officials are already laying the groundwork for that argument. Last week, Mr. Biden called the malware intrusion “reckless,” as it affected more than 18,000 companies, mostly in the United States. Personally, US officials are already testing an argument that Russia needs to be punished for “indiscriminate” hacking, while the United States only uses similar devices for targeted purposes. It is unclear whether the argument would prove capable of convincing others to join the steps to pay Russia.

Upcoming actions by Mr Biden are likely to include an executive order to improve the flexibility of government agencies and companies for attacks and proposals for mandatory disclosure of hacking. Many companies that lost data in Russia have not accepted it, either out of embarrassment or because there is no legal requirement to disclose a major breach.

But the sub-aspect of most of the testimony was that Russia’s intelligence services would have provided “backdoor” facilities to the US network. And this possibility – just fear of it – could prevent that kind of punishment for Mr. Biden. While he promised during the president’s transition to impose “substantial costs”, previous promises to hold Russia accountable did not create enough obstacles for them to worry about penalties if they were the most sophisticated supply-chain hacking in history Caught in.

“The reality is that they’re going to come back, and they’re going to be a perpetual crime,” said Kevin Mandia, chief executive officer FireEye, the cyberspace company that first detected intrusion The Russians stole their equipment to fight the hackers. Former Air Force intelligence officer Mr Mandia noted that “since the front door was closed,” the hackers turned to known but under-addressed weaknesses. In this case, they moved to the update system of network management software created by a company Orion. When users of SolarWinds Orion software downloaded the updated versions of the code, Russians were inside.

Source link

Leave a Comment