WHO spokesman Tariq Jasarevic asked for an answer to the letter, replying in an email that the team of experts who went to China “are working with their entire report as well as a summary report, which we understand is somewhat Released simultaneously in a week. “
The open letter noted that the WHO study was a joint effort by a team of external experts, selected by the Global Health Organization, who worked with Chinese scientists, and everyone should agree on the team’s report. The letter emphasized that the team was denied access to certain records and that laboratories in China were not investigated.
The letter, discovered by the team, states “is potentially useful to a limited extent, neither representing the WHO’s official position nor the result of an unrestricted, independent investigation.”
Without his name, the letter criticized Peter Daszak, an expert on animal diseases and his connection to human health, who heads Ecolites International. Letter Dr. Linked to articles about Daszak and stated that he had previously stated his belief that the virus was most likely a natural origin.
Dr. Daszak said the letter’s push to investigate the origins of a laboratory for the virus was a situation “supported by political agendas”.
“I urge the global community to wait for the publication of the report from the WHO mission,” he said.
Filpa Lentzos, a senior lecturer in science and international security at King’s College London, and one of the signatories of the letter, said, “I think that in order to conduct a credible investigation, it has to be more of a global effort to understand that. Should be taken to the United Nations General Assembly, where all the countries of the world are represented and the United Nations can vote on whether or not to mandate the Secretary-General to conduct such an investigation. ”