The question is how to set up such a system.
In 2013 former intelligence contractor Edward J. Following the disclosure of Snowden, who triggered a debate about government surveillance, US technology companies are wary of the presence of data-sharing with US intelligence agencies, even if it is a warning about data malware. The revelation in Snowden’s documents shocked Google that the National Security Agency was intercepting data transmitted overseas between its servers. Several years later, under pressure from his staff, he ended his involvement in Project Maven, an attempt by the Pentagon to use artificial intelligence to make its drones more accurate.
Amazon, by contrast, has no such agreement about sensitive government work: it runs cloud server operations for the CIA, but when the Senate Intelligence Committee asked company officials to testify last month – Fire, Microsoft and With the officials of SolarWinds – Russian how exploited systems on American soil to launch their attacks, they refused to participate.
Companies say they will need strong legal liability protection before they share reporting on vulnerabilities.
The most politically palatable headquarters for such a clearhouse – avoiding the legal and civil liberties concerns of using the National Security Agency – would be the Department of Homeland Security’s Cyberspace and Infrastructure Security Agency. Mr. Gerstel described the idea as “artificial intelligence working on automated computer sensors and information” and immediately comes back to spitting.
The department’s current “Einstein” system, which is supposed to monitor incursions and potential attacks on federal agencies, has never seen a Russian attack – even though it hit nine federal departments and agencies. The FBI, law experts say, does not have extensive surveillance capabilities, and is focused on threats from other types of crime, terrorism, and now domestic extremism.
Senator Angus King, a Maine independent, member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Senator Angus King said, “I don’t want intelligence agencies to spy on Americans, but the FBI is the domestic intelligence agency to deal with such attacks.” Co-Chairman of Cyberspace Commission. “I’m not sure they’re up for it.”
There are other hurdles. Mr-Gerstel said the process of obtaining a search warrant to track a nation-state cyber attack is too cumbersome. “In order for someone to be able to take that information from the NSA and immediately have a look at that computer,” he said. “But the FBI requires a warrant to do so, and takes the time by which the opposition has fled.”